Posts Tagged ‘Federal government’

The Law of the Land The United States Constitution part 1

Monday, September 7th, 2009

The Preamble

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Lets start with the word Tranquility, by definition it means; quality or state of being tranquil; calmness; peacefulness; quiet; serenity. Sounds like a good idea, now look at the domestic part of it domestic means; of or pertaining to the home, the household, household affairs, or the family: domestic pleasures.

Now taken into the account that the Federal Government at the time, was not allowed to settle disputes between the States. So having this in the Preamble of Constitution was important.If you think of the States as siblings, and the Federal Government being like a Parent when it comes to this. In fact you can use the Parent Sibling relationship throughout the Constitution, Keep in mind these are grown children, and Since we would not want one Governor of a State to order the invasion of another State its a good thing that its there. A lot of people read the first part and only see We the People. The entire text of the Preamble is very important if you want to understand the Constitution.

General Welfare is meant in the same content, meaning that the Federal Government would look out of the States General Welfare, not each individual. Keep in mind this also means that every person is looked out for, not just the rich or the poor. Or to put it really plain any person can grow up to be whatever they want. (provided they have the natural ability)

When they said secure the Blessing of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, is pretty simple, since posterity was used to mean future generations. Which is another sign from them that the Constitution was to be the law of the land for the United States forever……….

When they used Ordained they meant it in the sense of what the word means; To order by or as if by decree

When they sat down to write the Constitution they did not do so lightly nor did it only take them one night. Every word was well thought out. Lots of words where scratched.

  • Share/Bookmark

The hits just keep coming

Friday, August 7th, 2009

We may be on a nine-month reality time lag here. What investment master chiefs Jim Rogers and Marc Faber were saying about the danger to the dollar ten months ago mainstream pundits are saying today. And what South Carolina’s Mark Sanford and Texas Governor Rick Perry were saying about the bailouts last November, McCain is saying today.

“I think you could say that it is a short-term improvement in the economy. And I’ll be glad to give him [Obama] credit for that,” McCain told CNN’s John King in an interview taped Friday for State of the Union. “But the question that I think we should be asking are the long term consequences of this unprecedented debts and deficits — are they beneficial to the country? And I think the answer is no.”

Long term, Faber has said, the printing of money will bring inflation of 20% and possibly 100% in a sea of paper.

“Never have I seen such a transfer from the private enterprise system to the government of such massive scale,” he told Moore. He went through the list: car companies, banks, insurance firms owned by government, and he especially grimaced when he mentioned the $787 billion stimulus package.

In recent weeks, Rogers, speaking plainly, simply called it American communism. Let’s see who speaks up nine months hence.

The only time where we amassed greater debt was during World War II, and that was temporary spending, he said. “We won the world war and then cut back. But now . . . the spending is permanent.”

read the full article at Quigley

We are at a critical time in our history, never has the President told people that gatherings where staged, is this a third world country we now live in? Starting to look that way.

A recent White House blog written by the White House Director of New Media states that ”there is a lot of disinformation about health insurance reform out there” both on the web and floating around in chain emails.

The blog continues, ‘’since we can’t keep track of all of them here at the White House, we’re asking for your help. If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.”

This is absurd! In a nutshell, the White House is asking Americans to report on their neighbors, family, and friends who disagree with the President’s policy choices on health care.

As you can see the hits just keep coming :(

  • Share/Bookmark

Don’t let the media do it again

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Please lets stay focused on the real issues, the war, health care bills, and cap-n-trade. Don’t let the media pull another fast one, with the death of MJ and now with more bs coming out of the capitol about the CIA and VP Dick Cheney. Lets focus on the big picture. We can’t afford the health care bill, nor can we afford the cap-n-trade bill. Both are bad bills that only drive up the cost for your average citizen.

Most of the media is controlled by those who push President Obama’s agenda, a socialist America. Please call your elected officials and tell them no on both counts. We are all struggling one way or another to make ends meet, yet Congress and President Obama seem to think that they can get more from us. Lets not be fooled by any of these bills. When was the last time a law this size was passed that worked out good for the Middle Class? Don’t buy into the line of “we are only going to tax the rich” you know its a lie, and they know its a lie. It is a nice sound bite.

Anyone of us who have children owe it to them to stand up and be counted. Enough is enough, we are already spending their money, and now we are working on spending their kids money.

  • Share/Bookmark

Is this the Old Russian we live in? Or is it the United States of America?

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

Czar’s in America? You bet ya! We started out with one, Congress should have screamed bloody murder, someone should have pointed out that they where not part of the United States Government as defined by the Constitution. How many lawyers do we have in Congress? While I don’t know of the top of my head, its a safe bet that we have more then a handful. So why do we keep getting new Czar’s? These posts or positions are filled with long time supporters of which every President happens to be in office. Granted President Obama has doubled the number of Czars, maybe even tripled the number. Since they are trying to avoid the term Czar. However even the President can’t seem to refrain from using the word. He introduced Gil Kerlikowske as the “drug Czar” at a meeting this week.

Steve Forbes was quoted as saying this is a testament to government inefficiency, It underscores the inefficiency of government that you keep … having people, hoping that maybe they will get something done that the massive government bureaucracy cannot.

First for a cabinet post, which is what these positions amount to, they need to be confirmed by the Senate. However with the problems the President has had getting his cabinet confirmed, its no wonder the number of Czar’s have doubled with President Obama’s administration.

Lets keep in mind that President Obama did not start the Czar business but he sure is taking advantage of it.

I think its time that we made all of those seeking Federal Office to pass a test on the Constitution, after all it is the Law of the Land

  • Share/Bookmark

Your Government at Work

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

From the Charleston (W.Va.) Daily Mail

The inconvenient truth is that the United States must have a realistic, rational, national energy policy. …

Coal provides half the electric power that Americans count on. …

The United States will remain dependent on coal for decades to come, because adequate replacement sources do not exist and may never exist. Americans would have to cover hundreds of thousands of square miles of land … with windmills and solar cells to generate even a fraction of the power that now comes from coal.

That energy would be far more expensive, too.

A coal-free future would do devastating damage to the American economy.

None of that matters to the zealous fringe, which is interested only in the great morphed-up bugaboo called “global warming.”

… They do not concern themselves with the realities West Virginians face. They are not responsible for whether their fellow Americans have the reliable, reasonably priced power they need to sustain a competitive economy.

Elected officials — state and national — are responsible for all that and more.

It’s heavier lifting than grandstanding for television cameras, and should be taken more seriously.

From The Seattle Times

The “cash for clunkers” proposals to pay Americans as much as $4,500 to buy new cars and trucks is [sic] a questionable use of the public’s money.

… This is not a subsidy for all Americans, or all taxpayers. It’s a subsidy only for those who buy approved cars and trucks in the plan year.

Few of the buyers will be poor, because the poor are less likely to buy new cars and trucks, instead opting for used cars. But the old cars the government buys under these programs will not be put on the used-car market. They will be scrapped.

… The aim of the program is to stimulate the U.S. economy. But under the World Trade Organization agreement, each country promises to treat other members’ products under the same rules as its own. It’s generally a good rule, but it does mean any U.S. taxpayer subsidies will have to be available for the purchase of imports …

Finally, all this is happening when our state is laying off teachers and pushing 40,000 people off the Basic Health Plan. … It will be difficult to explain to people why there is not enough money for teachers and medicine but that government cash can be had if they buy themselves a new truck or car.

————————————————————————————————–
Siding with Chavez?

I wonder if President Obama feels comfortable siding with Hugo Chavez.

Chavez, who knows something about coups, is leading the opposition to the Honduran Coup, because his good buddy, Manuel Zelaya, was ousted by the military and replaced by somebody from his own political party.

Zelaya’s crime was to listen too closely to Mr. Chavez and try to run Honduras like Chavez has run Venezuela, which is to say, into the ground.

Zelaya, like Chavez, is a crackpot. He ran as a right-of-center candidate, but then had a change of heart in the middle of his term, became a left-wing darling of the Castro crowd, and then tried to change the Honduran Constitution so that he could keep taking Honduras to the left.

The military, with the full support of the Honduran Congress, said enough is enough, and exported Mr. Zelaya to a different country.

America doesn’t have the best of reputations when it comes to coups and South America, and that history puts the Obama administration in a tough spot.

They have to condemn the coup, because they don’t want the people of Central and South America thinking that the U.S. had anything to do with it.

On the other hand, it must make Mr. Obama somewhat uncomfortable to be seen allied with Mr. Chavez, the two-bit banana republic dictator.

Chavez — and his comrade in arms Daniel Ortega (as well as his other crackpot friend, Mr. Morales of Bolivia) — are all inspired by the leadership of Fidel Castro. They all want to follow his example of opposing the United States, suppressing political dissent, expropriating private property and generally imposing Soviet-style government on their people.

Zelaya thought that Chavez and his coven had it about right, and he too wanted to join the dictators’ club.

The Honduran military, which enjoys close cooperation with the American military, wasn’t going to let that happen. Neither was the Honduran Congress nor the political party that Mr. Zelaya still belongs to and once led.

We should keep quiet on this one, and support the people of Honduras. They were tired of Mr. Zelaya’s erratic behavior and they weren’t going to support his power-grab.

Military coups are never a good thing, but it was time for Mr. Zelaya to go. Let’s not give aid and comfort to that scourge of democracy, Mr. Chavez. Let the Hondurans handle it, and let’s hope that America stays out of it.

  • Share/Bookmark

GDP vs the national debt, We are tapped out

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

This should scare the hell out of anyone with a brain. In a perfect world our National debt would be around 25% of our GDP. It was not good when President Bush was in office at 37%, now with President Obama in office and the Democrats controlling both houses of Congress, it has already jumped up to 83%. Now before people jump up an claim that this was President Bush’s fault, lets look back at who has been in control of congress since 2006, and while we are looking back, lets reminder ourselves that Congress passes laws not the President.

While I give breaks or passes to both Presidents for the debt being higher then 25% due to fighting the war on terror, I can’t do so for President Obama’s new budget. With the projections looking to be about 97% in 2010, and after that its just unthinkable

Armstrong Williams has written a small post giving us some details as well as an insight as to why the Republican party should be the party of NO when it comes to spending….

Regardless of what party you belong to, You owe it to your kids and grand children to write, call and email your elected officials in Washington, telling them no more spending. Would you allow your house hold budget to get this bad?

Republican Ideas Worth Listening To

The national debt at the end of 2007 was 37 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), and at the end of June 2009 it is $11.7 trillion, or 83 percent of GDP.

Based on the President Obama’s 2010 budget, it is expected to increase to 97 percent of GDP at the end of 2010. Projections beyond that are particularly scary. The national debt in 2010 will be about $40,000 per American. To put this in perspective, the national debt for a family of four is almost as high as the average home value of $169,000 in 2009. Republicans should happily demur to be the party of “no” when it comes to these unfunded spending increases.

There are many good Republican ideas, but the Democrats do not like these ideas because they tend to favor lower taxes, lower spending, less federal government regulation and control and more individual responsibility.

Instead of saying that the Republicans are the party of “no,” the political discourse would be more productive if politicians and the media recognize that the fundamental difference between the two parties on the economy lies in their different view of the role of government. Democrats generally believe that greater government control of the economy and extensive social welfare programs improve Americans’ well-being. Republicans generally believe that the market and individuals do a better job than the government in improving Americans’ well-being.

Democrats prefer to let Washington politicians and bureaucrats make decisions about people’s lives. Republicans prefer to let people make their own decisions about their lives.

  • Share/Bookmark

THOUGHT FOR THE DAY: Inspiration From the Life of George Washington, American Hero

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

On June 16, 1775, George Washington addressed the Continental Congress in Philadelphia, accepting command of the American armed forces in the coming revolutionary struggle against Britain. Washington refused a salary for his military leadership, which would stretch out over nearly eight years. In so doing, in asking for nothing, Washington set a tone of service and sacrifice which inspires Americans to this day.

Here are some memorable and inspiring quotes from Washington, illustrating his civic, patriotic–and moral–vision:

“I have no other view than to promote the public good, and am unambitious of honors not founded in the approbation of my Country.”

In part because because of Washington’s great example, America is not saddled with a costly nobility or an opportunity-killing class system. For Washington, the esteem of his fellow Americans was reward enough for his hard work and heroism.

Washington also understood that a leader had to set a good example to the nation: “I hope I shall possess firmness and virtue enough to maintain what I consider the most enviable of all titles, the character of an honest man.” And, of course, he was completely successful in burnishing his reputation for honesty, a reputation that still shines brightly, more than two centuries after his death.

And yet all Americans, too, could and should set an example, because, as he explained, “Happiness and moral duty are inseparably connected.” Washington believed, along with the other Founders, that limited government without personal self-government was a disaster waiting to happen.

But Washington knew that human beings could not do it all by themselves. As he said, “Labor to keep alive in your breast that little spark of celestial fire, called conscience.” Going further, Washington made it clear that morality needed a profound source: “Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”

And finally, he told us, “Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God.”

Indeed it is. But more than two centuries later, in our own lives, we can take increased devotion from the life of George Washington, who didn’t just talk the talk–he walked the walk.

Fox Nation

  • Share/Bookmark

Put the breaks on! Stop Government spending

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

What I feel we need to do as a Nation;

First is to freeze all spending on everything but the war. Don’t spend another dime on any new programs.

Lets take a good hard look at what we have now. Those programs that need to be fixed lets fix them first. Social Security is one program that we all know needs to be fixed. Lets fix it. Make the hard political choice or as we used to say “man up”. Why should we start another new program when we have on this large that needs to be fixed? Lets fix one problem at a time.

From there we need to fix Medicare and Medicaid, we all know there are major problems with these programs so lets fix them before we start thinking about Nationalized health care.

Our borders are still wide open, lets seal the borders. I am not against legal immigration so please spare me the racist remarks. We spend a ton of money each year on illegal immigrants on both housing and medical care. We need to make sure that a person who is getting treatment at a hospital is here in our country legally. I am not saying do not treat those who come in needing care, but while you are treating them, INS needs to be called so they can pick them up, and deport them. If a person is not a citizen of our country they should not have the same rights as a citizen. I do not want them abused, just deported. It’s very simple thing to do, you know someone is breaking a law make them report it. We need to say enough is enough. Its time we got tough with people breaking our laws. This is part of the reason that our health care is so expensive, people come into out ER’s and know they will be treated. Fine treat them but deport them when they are well enough to travel.

Outlaw the word marriage for our legal contracts that the states sell. Call them what they are “Civil Unions” and be done with the Gay marriage issue. No matter how you feel on the issue the bottom line is 2 consenting adults should have the same rights regardless of their sexual preferences…. We have wasted way to much time on this issue.

Return all power that is not entrusted to the Federal Government by the Constitution to the States. This would save a ton of money from the Federal Budget and Save the states money. Less taxes from the Federal Government and more money would go to the States budget. This way people can see what they are paying for. As it is now I have no clue as to where are tax dollars are going to. Other then all of the bailouts.

Get rid of the Czars! They are not a part of the checks and balances of our Government, in fact if challenged they may even be Unconstitutional. Another words illegal. They are not confirmed by the Senate, and they only answer to the President? something is wrong with that picture….. It’s why we have checks and balances… We should never have allowed the first Czar, since it is a cabinet position in everything but name…

Any new spending bill that We feel we need should be listed on line, the entire bill, with a detailed list of where the money is going and why.. No more blank checks.

Repeal the TARP bailouts we have not spent all of the money so lets stop it. Repeal the Stimulus bill, once again we have not spent all of the money, so lets pull back. The economy has not nor will it be really helped by it. So lets not waste anymore of out tax money.

It does not matter what party you belong to, we should be above party’s Let focus not on a party but on what’s best for America.

If you really believe that going in debt more then we already are as a Nation is good or needed, then you need a reality check

These are just a few things that I feel we need to act on today, not next week!

  • Share/Bookmark

62 Million Voiceless Americans (Nancy Morgan)

Friday, June 12th, 2009

I already know what some will say, we had to put up with it for 8 years now it’s our turn…… sadly while President Bush made a lot of mistakes, he did not try to wreck the American way of life. Now it seems that the left want’s to turn the USA into a Socialist country. It’s so bad that Russian news papers are making fun of are rapid turn torwards socialism.

Nancy Morgan via Flopping Aces
Is it still called debate when only one side controls the conversation? That’s the question the 62 million Americans who didn’t vote for Obama are asking themselves.

62 million Americans now have absolutely no voice in the way our country is being governed. No say in the quadrupling of our debt or in the onerous taxes being piled on top of record unemployment. They have no say in the pending trillion dollar health care ‘reform’ or the more costly ‘cap and trade’ legislation steadily making its way through Congress.

With Democrats firmly in control of the White House and the House of Representatives, and most likely the Senate, the left has found no need for bipartisanship. After all, ‘Obama won.’ Case closed.

Should any pesky Republican complain, the voice goes unheard – kinda like a tree falling in a forest. Did it really fall if no one heard it? The right is reduced to pondering questions like these as the left continues implementing radical change at breakneck speed. Changes that affect every segment of our society and every single American. Changes that are being implemented without the requisite ‘national conversation’. Why hold a conversation?

The left is in control and there is no need to consult with the people they were elected to govern. The politicians and the experts know best. And should the GOP try to halt this tsunami of ‘change’, a quick change of the filibuster rule to 51 instead of 60 is put in place. That’ll teach em.

Under the guise of fighting the non-crisis of global warming, the EPA has declared the very air we breathe to be dangerous. Not to worry. Uncle Sam will save us. Here comes cap and trade. It will only cost $3,100 extra in energy costs per family.

Under the guise of universal health care, our government is preparing to take over app. 17% of our economy by nationalizing health care. Not to worry, they are consulting with the policymakers in Canada responsible for the sterling healthcare in that country. The very same government health care that forces Canadians to come to the US to get their medical needs taken care of.

Under the guise of saving the economy, the feds have taken over banks, insurance companies and car companies, prompting even thug dictator Chavez to joke, “Hey, Obama has just nationalized nothing more and nothing less than General Motors. Comrade Obama! Fidel, careful or we are going to end up to his right.”

Under the guise of saving us from those nasty capitalists, Obama has appointed a new Pay Czar to make sure no-one is paid more than the politicians deem they are worth. At least those who are unfortunate to work for companies that have received bailout funds. And in one case, the formerly sovereign state of South Carolina has actually been forced to take bailout funds, and accept all the strings that come with it.

Consent of the governed is being ignored as the Obama administration hijacks ever more power to the federal government, in direct contravention of the 10th amendment and the Constitution. And 62 million Americans can do nothing except marvel at the audacity.

The left is rejoicing at finally being able to implement utopia here on earth. A utopian vision that has consistently failed whenever it has been foisted upon a populace, either through charisma or brute force. But never mind. Obama’s utopia will work, experts assure us.

The experts who now hold us hostage are first and foremost, political beings, having been appointed ‘czars’ on the basis of political connections as opposed to merit. They are thoroughly steeped in theory and liberal orthodoxy and severely lacking in real world experience.

These unelected czars (15 at last count) now have control of our tax dollars and the regulatory bureaucracy that enables them to enforce their whims. Whims which are based more on political expediency than the rule of law. They will never be held accountable when their theories are tested and fail. And fail they must, as history has taught the 62 million people who didn’t vote for Obama.

As we speak, the left, with the willing compliance of an adoring media, are kowtowing to our enemies while demonizing and penalizing capitalists, the very wealth creators whose money now allows the government to implement an agenda anti ethical to the American way of life.

The Obama administration, under the guise of tolerance, inclusion, multiculturalism, empathy and concern for the disenfranchised, are destroying jobs though regulation and taxation. A total of 2.19 million jobs have been lost since Obama became President. (The news that Wal-Mart will be adding 22,000 jobs this year is ignored, as they did it without unions or government help.)

The Democrats are enacting legislation that makes it impossible for America to become energy independent, while at the same time, partnering with Arab countries to help them develop nuclear energy.

Our ‘leaders’ are burdening America with an unsustainable level of debt while at the same time, continuing to send our tax dollars ($106 Billion) to the IMF to bail out the world. And sending $200 million more to Pakistan to help out with their refugees.

The Left, with Obama as its messiah, believing that all cultures and countries should be equal, are systematically reducing America to third world status. A level playing field at last. Whew.

Meanwhile, the 62 million people who didn’t vote for Obama wait in vain for their own elected representatives to stand up and say STOP. Alas, aside from a handful of Republicans like Sarah Palin, Mark Sanford, Jim DeMint, Rick Perry and Dick Cheney, the silence from the Republicans is deafening.

62 million Americans are watching America squander its greatness on the altar of catchy, unproven, politically correct notions. And this American is wondering if the destructive policies that are being foisted upon us without our consent and without debate, are being enacted through stupidity or design.

  • Share/Bookmark

OBAMA’S MORTGAGE RESCUE PLAN IS A FAILURE (Dick Morris)

Thursday, June 11th, 2009

No matter what people may think of Dick Morris he seldom stays far from the truth. You can try and spin this any way you want, but the numbers do not lie. Its time we stopped this foolishness and let the chips fall where they may.

By Dick Morris

The data for April and May prove that Obama’s plan to rescue those facing mortgage foreclosure is a dismal failure. Since this issue was the cornerstone of his economic program during the campaign, its abject failure is a significant setback for the Administration’s economic plan.

In the month ending on May 26th, 464,983 foreclosures of subprime and Alt-A mortgages (out of a universe of 3.2 million studied). So 15% of all subprime mortgages were foreclosed in May! Only 19,041 — a paltry 6% — were modified during this period. And of those modified, only 11,200 involved any reduction in the monthly payments! Only 12% involved any write-off of interest, fees, or principal and 27% of the loan modifications actually increased the monthly payments due.

Alan M. White of the Valparaiso Law School, who conducted the study, noted that the data showed that “the Administration’s plan to stimulate mortgage modifications does not seen to have had much effect yet, at least in this market segment” [i.e. subprimes].

And the trend lines are all bad:

• The number of loan modifications dropped 11% from April to May.

• The ratio of foreclosure losses to modification write downs (the amount lost in foreclosure: the amount rescued by write-downs) doubled in the past month. For every dollar saved in modifications, $150 was lost in foreclosure.

When Obama launched his mortgage rescue plan, he promised that it would help five million households. So far, he is about 4,969,000 short of his goal!!

When will the subprime foreclosures stop? In about a year when all of these unfortunate people have lost their homes!

Why is Obama’s plan falling so far short of the mark? The fault is its own restrictions. You cannot get a loan modification if:

• You have lost your job

• You owe more than 5% above what your house is worth

• You are already in default

• You have not yet missed at least one payment

• Your lender does not want to participate

• Your mortgage is not one of the half of all mortgages insured or owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac

• The reworked mortgage payment would come to more than 31% of your income

• Your mortgage is over $759,000

• The home is not your primary residence

The number of beleaguered homeowners who can slip through the eye of this particular needle and qualify for a mortgage modification is tiny.

(We discuss failure of Obama’s mortgage relief program at length in our new book Catastrophe, due out on June 23rd. Pre-orders of signed books are available at DickMorris.com)

And yet there is an easy remedy at hand. Obama should simply say, as they did in Sweden, that the government will simply buy the distressed mortgages from the banks and adjust the payments to make them possible for the homeowners. Then, when the economy comes back, the homeowners could either pay back the government what they owe for the postponed payments or sell the house and repay the feds from the proceeds. If they won’t do either, the feds could then seize the house and get their money back. Cost to the taxpayers: zero. In f act, they would likely make a profit.

Why won’t Obama do this? It’s because a Democratic administration cannot throw people out of their homes. Better to let them default and make the big, bad bank do the dirty work.

All these facts underscore how cynical was Obama’s campaign in predicating so much of its economic message on an appeal to help those facing foreclosure. You don’t hear Obama talk about foreclosures any more do you? That’s because he knows he has no solution and that he won’t offer any.

  • Share/Bookmark