Posts Tagged ‘cap and trade’

EPA Admits Cap-and-Trade Won’t work

Friday, July 17th, 2009

For anyone who has not read this you need to………..
EPA Admits Cap-and-Trade Won’t Work

EPA Administrator Jackson confirmed an EPA analysis showing that unilateral U.S. action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions would have no effect on climate. Moreover, when presented with an EPA chart depicting that outcome, Energy Secretary Steven Chu said he disagreed with EPA’s analysis.

“I believe the central parts of the [EPA] chart are that U.S. action alone will not impact world CO2 levels,” Administrator Jackson said.

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) presented the chart to both Jackson and Secretary Chu, which shows that meaningful emissions reductions cannot occur without aggressive action by China, India, and other developing countries. “I am encouraged that Administrator Jackson agrees that unilateral action by the U.S. will be all cost for no climate gain,” Sen. Inhofe said. “With China and India recently issuing statements of defiant opposition to mandatory emissions controls, acting alone through the job-killing Waxman-Markey bill would impose severe economic burdens on American consumers, businesses, and families, all without any impact on climate.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Cap and trade bill and fear mongering

Wednesday, June 17th, 2009

Fear should never be allowed to enter into politics, we saw the bad results with President Bush, and if we allow President Obama to do it again we will see bad results. What both party’s need to do is give the American Citizen the facts, and then allow us to decide what’s best for our family’s and our country. For far to long we have allowed the Politicians to run our Country with little thought on what is really going on except, during an election year. Even during an Election year we (the American Citizen) tend to look out for only what’s in our best interest, instead of gathering all of the information and making an educated decision. It’s time we all stopped and looked at the big picture. At this time even thinking about introducing the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill is insane. We are in the worst economic era since the great depression yet Congress and the President insist on introducing this bill. The cost to our way of life alone is enough to make you question what type of mind altering drugs they must be taking in Washington

by Red Maryland

Barack Obama is now doubling down on the fear mongering in order to get the massive tax increase/boondoggle that is the Waxman-Markey cap and trade bill through the House of Representatives. The cooler climate appears to be an insignificant truth, for The One, who deems it’s getting hotter. Fortunately for us the climate isn’t an inconvenient Inspector General, who can be fired.

The Obama administration is poised for its most forceful confrontation with the American public on the sweeping and life-altering consequences of a failure to act on global warming with the release today of a long-awaited scientific report on climate change.

The report, produced by more than 30 scientists at 13 government agencies dealing with climate change, provides the most detailed picture to date of the worst case scenarios of rising sea levels and extreme weather events: floods in lower Manhattan; a quadrupling of heat waves deaths in Chicago; withering on the vineyards of California; the disappearance of wildflowers from the slopes of the Rockies; and the extinction of Alaska’s wild polar bears in the next 75 years.

Today’s release is part of a carefully crafted strategy by the White House to help build public support for Obama’s agenda and boost the prospects of a climate change bill now making its way through Congress.

Americans have already been living with evidence of changing climate, the report said. Over the last 30 years winters have grown shorter and milder, with a 3.9C (7F) rise in winter temperatures in the midwest and northern Great Plains. Hurricanes have become deadlier. If climate change is left unchecked, the future promises to bring even more ferocious hurricanes to coastal regions – in the Pacific as well as the Atlantic, punishing droughts to the south-west, and increasingly severe winter storms in the north-east and around the Great Lakes.

The human consequences, as envisaged by the draft, are similarily catastrophic: potential food shortages because of declining wheat and corn yields in the breadbasket of the mid-west, increased outbreaks of food poisoning and epidemic diseases.

US cities will be choking because of deteriorating air quality; leisure pursuits will disappear. The report predicts that the ski season in the north-east will be 20%shorter. As for summer holidays, 14 of 17 North Carolina beaches will be permanently underwater by 2080, the draft forecasts.

Of course, these “claims” are based on the same discredited, faulty computer models, which do nothing but predict doom and gloom. One could enter Betty Crocker recipes into these models and get the same result. As Chris Horner notes the report was written by the same stooges pulling the same stunts they did with the first National Assessment on Climate Change in 2000. A report that the Competitive Enterprise Institute forced the Department of Justice to slap a warning label on that warned readers that it was not subjected to the scrutiny of the Federal Information Quality Act. Nor, as Horner notes would those models be admissible in federal court because they would fail the Supreme Court’s Daubert test for sound science.

We here in Maryland have seen this type of stupid environmentalist trick before.

Should Obama’s fear mongering move the weak lilies in the House from their opposition to the bill here’s what it will get us:

· Reduce aggregate gross domestic product (GDP) by $7.4 trillion,
· Destroy 844,000 jobs on average, with peak years seeing unemployment rise by over 1,900,000 jobs,
· Raise electricity rates 90 percent after adjusting for inflation,
· Raise inflation-adjusted gasoline prices by 74 percent,
· Raise residential natural gas prices by 55 percent,
· Raise an average family’s annual energy bill by $1,500, and
· Increase inflation-adjusted federal debt by 29 percent, or $33,400 additional federal debt per person, again after adjusting for inflation.

  • Share/Bookmark

A Better Energy Alternative to “Cap and Tax” (Rep. Don Manzullo)

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Cap-n-trade does not work in Europe but just like everything else that fails there, the Democrats what to try it here. From Health Care to the Environment. It amazes me that so many educated people have been sold on global warming. When confronted with the truth, your a bad person because you don’t want to save the planet. The planet does not need saving, She has been here long before humans every walked the earth and She will be here long after we are gone.

(Rep. Don Manzullo energy bill
May 14th, 2009

Next week, the House Energy and Commerce Committee plans to take the first step to compel people through disincentives to move away from carbon-based energy sources primarily through a “cap and trade” system or what should be more accurately called a “cap and tax” system. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that a “cap and tax” program will increase energy costs by as much as $2,200 per family. These higher energy costs would disproportionately hurt the poor because, according to CBO, they spend 21.4 percent of their income on energy-intensive items.

Great lets increase the poor and elderly’s burden. :(

To top it all, there is no guarantee that this approach will actually reduce greenhouse gasses. In the European Union (E.U.), which has a cap and trade system in place, greenhouse gas emissions increased between 2000 and 2006, according to the European Environment Agency (EEA). At the same time, many energy-intensive industries relocated from Europe to North Africa and the former Soviet Union, in part, to escape the E.U. “cap and tax” system, and now emit even more pollution than before.

Let’s see, cap and trade, greenhouse gas emissions go up, so now we want to follow the same failed plan?

What’s ironic is that according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), greenhouse gas emissions decreased in the United States from 6.29 million metric tons to 6.09 million metric tons between 2000 and 2007 without a “cap and tax” system — this reduction was accomplished through voluntary goals, technology improvements, and conservation. Simply put, a “cap and tax” system that is not duplicated around the world, particularly among larger emerging nations, will only result in our manufacturing jobs, particularly in energy intensive industries, and our pollution problems transferred abroad. As the senior Republican on the Asia, the Pacific & the Global Environment Subcommittee, I know that any climate change legislation or agreement that excuses China from serious and verifiable commitments will simply accelerate and make irreversible the trend of making China the manufacturer for the world while increasing global greenhouse gas emissions.

Allowing us to police ourselves worked? That should surprise no one, as most Americans want to do the right thing. Yes even those evil greedy business owners.(I don’t think making money is evil)

There is a better alternative. That’s why I agreed to co-sponsor the American Energy Innovation Act (H.R.2300) because it represents a positive, incentive-based alternative to meet our energy needs as we transition to non-carbon-based sources for our future energy needs. It does so by increasing environmentally-safe energy production on remote lands and far off our shores; promoting the use of alternative fuels that will reduce carbon emissions, such as nuclear, clean-coal, and renewable energy technologies; and encouraging conservation to preserve and protect our natural resources.

“Cap and tax” only attempts to combat one form of air pollution. The issue is dealing equally with all forms global pollution — air, water, and ground. Let’s do everything in our power to promote effective, proven solutions through innovation and incentives to limit global pollution without the unintended consequence of simply shifting our jobs and our pollution problems to other emerging nations that do not take this problem seriously. The command-and-control, government-knows-best solution, which is currently being debated in Congress, is the wrong approach because it will impose serious costs to our struggling economy without any assurance that “cap and tax” will reduce global pollution.

I will wait to comment on Rep Manzullo’s bill till I can read the entire thing. Lets hope he use’s a good old fashion common sense solution to the problem.

  • Share/Bookmark

Reconciliation What is it?

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

Reconciliation, originally designed in the 1974 Budget Act as a means for helping the government save money and keep federal budgets closer to balance, allows for certain legislation to pass both houses of Congress on an expedited basis — and perhaps most importantly, to pass the Senate with a bare majority.


Fast Forward to 2009 we now have The Democrats in Congress and President Obama trying to use this or rather they are going to use this to cram socialized medicine down out throats. But wait it gets much worse, how are they going to pay for this? Cap-n-Trade. Something that you may have heard about. I will sum that up in just a few words as possible. Anything that use’s energy, your car, house, boat, etc……you will see that billed doubled at the least some say tripled. Hold on that’s not the end of it, any consumable’s you buy, will also have a price increase after all the store that you buy these things from is also going to have an increase in energy cost, as well as the trucking company’s that deliver these goods. Let’s not forget about dining out, once again same deal, Restaurant will have to pass the new energy cost to you.

“We’ve seen mission creep with reconciliation under both Republicans and Democrats — there’s no question about that,” said Ryan. “But this takes mission creep to a whole new level. Now they’re talking about the possible nationalization of 17 percent of our economy in health care, 8 percent of the economy in energy, and the largest tax increase in history — all through a process which will have between 35 and 105 total hours of debate between the House and the Senate . . . That’s an enormous power grab.”

David Freddoso from NRO blog has a great post about this, that has a lot more information then I do.

  • Share/Bookmark

Cap and Trade

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

What Cap and Trade really is. Why not just have a usage tax on each American ? God Forbid they are honest about it. At least Senator Inhofe’s is. Pay Close attention to what he has to say. This is a huge tax increase for the middle class. Not to mention what it will do to jobs, because China and other countries are not going to follow along, so more jobs will be sent over seas.

  • Share/Bookmark

Don’t be fooled by AIG bonus Hype

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

This is standard Politics, more smoke and mirrors. All Obama camp is trying to do is distract the American Citizen from his budget request. He expect’s us to sink our teeth into AIG and overlook his 3.6 trillion dollar budget request. As far as I am concerned, AIG can do what it wants with the money that was giving to them. If their employee’s had contracts stating they get x for this, then they should get what was agreed on. I am not for the bonuses, however I did not sign the contract with them.

Please don’t allow Congress and The President to distract us from the bigger issue. Which is a 3.6 trillion dollar budget request, which adds a huge tax increase on everyone with the CAP-N-TRADE permits it will impose on the energy companies, Who will in turn, pass on the cost to the consumer.Oh and don’t fall for the line that the tax reduction will pay for this energy increase, 13 a week will not pay for it.

  • Share/Bookmark